Sarah Palin flow chart
Over at Daily Kos, there's a helpful flow chart to understand how Gov. Palin decided to answer questions during the debate.
Maxim-(MAK-sim)-noun: 1. A proverb, principle, or saying 2. The author of this blog
Over at Daily Kos, there's a helpful flow chart to understand how Gov. Palin decided to answer questions during the debate.
Dear Senator Obama:
This is your chance. Leading up to the Democratic primary, you inspired us with your message of hope and change. I want to believe in it, and so do millions of other Americans. But, so far, your campaign has not delivered on your promise to end politics as usual. Now is the time to show us, through your campaign, the change that you intend to bring to Washington.
In Denver, you rejected the "politics of the past" and encouraged Americans to demand new leadership. Well, we're demanding it�of you and your campaign. We demand an end to a generic, uninspired campaign influenced by consultants and pollsters. We demand a candidate who rejects the idea that the road to victory is paved with empty promises of jobs created and taxes lowered. We demand an end to daily, fake-personal e-mails from a candidate, his wife, and his campaign manager asking us to donate money. We demand new television ads that are creative and fresh and inspiring, that make us question our belief about what a national political ad can and should be. We're ready to reject the politics of the past, but to do so, we need to see an example of the politics of the future.
The great revolutionary Mahatma Ghandi, said, "Be the change you want to see in the world." We ask you, Senator, to be the change you want to see in Washington. Let your campaign be an example to the country of what an Obama presidency would look like. I want to believe. We want to believe. This is your chance. Make us believe.
Sincerely,
Maxim Weinstein
Medford, Massachusetts
Labels: barackobama, campaign, election
So let me get this straight. John McCain says that Barack Obama lacks the experience necessary to lead the country because he hasn't served in the military and has only served one term as a senator. He then picks as his running mate someone who has never been in the military, has no national political experience, and has only served half a term as governor of a state with a population about the size of Boston?
I guess he's just desperate to get votes from the Christian right, who love Gov. Palin because of her fundamentalist religious views.
Labels: campaign
"Just think about this: In four months, we will have an administration that actually believes in science!" --Mark Warner, former governor of Virginia, at the Democratic National Convention
As reported by Wired's Threat Level blog.
Labels: barackobama, campaign
The group at Sciencedebate 2008 put together a set of 14 community-generated questions for McCain and Obama regarding their views on science and technology policy. As an Obama supporter, I'm planning to e-mail the Obama campaign to encourage it to respond publicly to these questions. I hope more people will do the same with their candidate of choice, or with both for those who are undecided.
Labels: campaign, election, obama, technology
My friend Jon, author of Our Karl Rove, has a good post up about the fallout from the Democratic primary and what it means for supporters of both Obama and Clinton going into the general election.
The key take-away is to acknowledge that if you strongly support either candidate, you're experiencing planned animosity towards the opponent. The sooner Democrats step back and understand that this is planned and not personal (and "see the diamond"), the sooner the Democrats can coalesce around the presumptive Democratic nominee.The "diamond" is a metaphor for the separation that occurs between candidates during the primary and the desired convergence on behalf of party unity that occurs as the general election nears.
So, I'm supporting Barack Obama in the Democratic primary. Why? Here are a few reasons:
Labels: barackobama, campaign, democrats, election, obama
It's good to be blogging again!
As an active Democrat, people have been asking me lately who I'm supporting for next year's presidential nomination. The answer: I don't know. Why? Because it's not even the year of the election yet! I consider my passivity in this regard to be a form of quiet protest against the ever-lengthening campaign season.
The election is nearly a year away. The Democratic National Convention is nine months away. The Massachusetts primary, even if it is successfully moved, is over two months away. The way I see it, I don't need to choose a candidate and start campaigning for him/her until at least January 2, which is after the holidays and still gives me a month to support my candidate.
As for initial thoughts, I like fellow Tufts alum Bill Richardson, who is likely the most qualified candidate in the field. Sadly, though, he doesn't seem to have enough financial support or "buzz" to get the nomination. I also like Obama and Edwards on the surface, but I really need to learn more about their policy ideas and whom they've surrounded themselves with (that's a topic for a future post) before I could pick my favorite. But hey, I have at least another month to decide, right?
Labels: barackobama, billrichardson, campaign, democrats, election, johnedwards